South Korea reveals plans to assasinate North Korean tyrant Kim Jong-Un using undercover hitmen

South Korea's defence minister Han Min-koo has said his country has a plan to launch a special forces Unit to
go to North Korea and kill Supreme leader Kim Jong-Un if he decides to attack South Korea with missiles.
According to Han Min-koo, military chiefs are “considering launching a special forces unit to assassinate North
Korean leader Kim Jong Un.”
The operation would be part of ‘Korea Massive Punishment and Retaliation’ plan (KMPR), which was announced
after North Korea’s tested it's fifth nuclear warhead earlier this month, Han added during a parliamentary meeting
in Seoul on Wednesday.
According to Korean times, Commandos and precision missile attacks will be deployed in Pyongyang if Kim
Jong-un deploys one of his nukes on South Korean soil.
According to Han, the retaliatory attack will be supported by Seoul's missile defence system and a pre-emptive
attack system operated by the US called 'Kill Chain'.
Han added:
“If it becomes clear the enemy is moving to attack the South with nuclear missiles, in order to suppress its
aims, the concept [of the special forces] is to destroy key figures and areas that include the North Korean
leadership,” Han told lawmakers.

How Hillary Clinton could win

The 2016 race remains within the margin of error in the
latest CNN/ORC poll
Clinton has started to be more aggressive against
Donald Trump this week

Editor's Note: This is the second of a two-part series looking at the path to victory for Donald Trump and Hillary
Clinton. Click here for the first story: How Donald Trump could win
(CNN) — Hillary Clinton has advantages heading into the final stretch of the campaign that any presidential
candidate would envy: a fleet of popular surrogates, a mountain of cash and an opponent who is often
sidetracked by self-inflicted wounds.
Yet the Democratic nominee enters this home stretch in a dead heat against Donald Trump, according to a
CNN/ORC poll released Tuesday.
The close contest heading into the fall underscores Clinton's vulnerabilities on trust and honesty -- and her need
to summon a relentless and efficient ground game, even if many of her voters are fueled more by revulsion
toward Trump than excitement about her.
But in many ways, the nation's changing demographics make this Clinton's race to lose.
"In a sense, Trump can't win this election," said veteran pollster Neil Newhouse. "But Hillary can lose it."
In order to succeed where 17 Republican candidates failed to beat Trump, Clinton must maintain an incessant
focus on her unpredictable rival and persuade voters that he lacks the temperament, character and knowledge
required of a potential commander-in-chief.
Clinton, press do awkward dance at 30,000 feet
Clinton has already adopted an aggressive approach this week. She's held briefings for reporters on her new
campaign jet two days in a row. She slammed Trump's character and failure to release his tax returns. And she
blasted his business career, which is at the center of his campaign as full of "scams" and "frauds."
That is one way of trying to keep the conversation away from the private email server and accusations about the
Clinton Foundation that appear to have hurt her standing in recent weeks.
Despite signs the race is narrowing -- the CNN/ORC national poll showed her two points behind Trump among
likely voters -- Clinton's insists she's not rattled.
"I don't really pay attention to polls," she told reporters on her plane Tuesday. "When they are good for me, and
there have been a lot of them that have been good for me recently, I don't pay attention. When they are not so
good, I don't pay attention. We are on a course that we are sticking with."
A senior Clinton campaign official predicted single-digit battles across the swing states that will decide the
election. But ultimately her campaign stresses it expected a close race and single digit battles in swing states,
but believes it has multiple routes to 270 electoral votes and that Trump has a much narrower path
Some Clinton critics have, however, warned that her approach in August -- spending much of the month
fundraising away from TV cameras after the Democrats' successful convention in Philadelphia -- lacked the go-
for-broke energy of her rival.
"Trump is running a high-risk campaign right now. They have to, because they are behind and have eight weeks
to go," Newhouse, who was a pollster for 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, said before
Clinton upped the pace after Labor Day.
"I don't think her campaign has shown any real guts or faith in their candidate. They're not bold. They are setting
themselves up for a potential loss by a thousand cuts."
Seizing on demographic and geographical advantages
It is without dispute that the hurdles for Trump are enormous. With assistance from teleprompters, he has
becomed more disciplined as a candidate, but he has yet to convince voters in swing states, where Clinton
leads most polls, that he is fit to be president.
For Clinton, the demographics of the electorate work in her favor, and she appears to be reassembling the
Obama coalition that was decisive in the 2008 and 2012 elections. She leads Trump among voters under the
age of 45 by 54% to 29% and among non-whites 71% to 18%, according to the CNN/ORC poll.
Democratic strategist and pollster Celinda Lake noted that Trump has consistently trailed by about 12 points
where Romney was among married women in 2012. Romney also ran strong among white women -- and led
President Barack Obama in exit polls among white women 56% to 42%.
Trump's campaign has yet to show any real effort to improve his image among women, beyond his attempt to
appear more moderate with his minority outreach to African-Americans.
Trump is also some 20 points behind his Democratic opponent among college-educated women, Lake said,
compared to Romney and 2008 GOP presidential nominee John McCain, who were about 5 and 8 points behind,
respectively.
Beyond that, the demographic where Trump runs strongest -- non college-educated white men -- is dropping as
a share of the electorate each year.
"So he is relying on an ever-diminishing pool of votes, where she is relying on an ever-expanding portion of
votes," Lake said. To win, she said, "He would need to win the first debate; he would need to have a collapse of
Democratic turnout; and he would really need to close the race with independents and women."
The likelihood of those factors falling into place is slim. But the one way to put the race in reach for Trump, she
said, "is to assume that it's out of reach."
So the key for Clinton will be getting those vital constituencies out to vote. That's where her high-powered roster
of surrogates comes in.
Obama, First Lady Michelle Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and her primary foe Bernie Sanders remain highly
popular among key sectors of the Democratic coalition.
They will be vital to driving up swing-state turnout in Democratic strongholds like Cleveland, Philadelphia,
Northern Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, and parts of Florida that could decide the election.
Addressing the trust deficit
Clinton is certain to seize on any foreign policy or temperamental missteps by Trump to bolster her argument
that her foe is a "loose cannon" who can't be trusted with America's nuclear arsenal.
His efforts to reach out to minorities in recent weeks have managed, in some cases, to further alienate them.
His campaign has yet to demonstrate it can string together, not just a couple of good days, but a good two
months, given his disadvantages on the electoral map.
And beyond just having a good first debate later this month, Trump must force Clinton into making some
mistakes to have a chance of winning, strategists said.
The two candidates face similar hurdles in the sense that both may find it almost impossible to change voters'
opinions about them at this point. After all, Clinton and Trump are the most unpopular nominees of any major
party in memory.
Both Clinton and Trump are widely distrusted. In the CNN/ORC survey, only 42% had a favorable impression of
the former secretary of state while the real estate mogul was barely better with 45%.
Clinton clearly has work to do on the trust issue, though. Fifty percent of voters said Trump was more honest
and trustworthy. Only 35% chose Clinton.
"People just don't trust Hillary Clinton, and they don't trust her -- not on the basis of one single thing -- but on
the basis of whole collections of things going back over 20 to 30 years," said Democratic pollster Peter Hart,
noting that voters cite an array of her controversies from Whitewater to her email server.
The trust factor -- as well as the sense among many voters that they can't relate to Clinton or understand her as
person -- loom as challenges for the former secretary of state, because there is no one thing she can do in the
next two months to fix those issues.
Because of the depth of distrust, voters are unlikely to give her the benefit of the doubt if something goes
wrong, or she faces a new set of revelations, Hart said.
"They're locked in terms of who she is on the issue of integrity," Hart said. "There is not an individual issue that
she can address and that has a tremendous negative effect. All of this is baked in.... It doesn't mean that she's
going to lose the election. It's like driving your car on the shoulder: that's fine, unless a car nudges you over and
then you've got nothing going for you."
The trust factor -- as well as the sense among many voters that they can't relate to Clinton or understand her as
person -- loom as challenges for the former secretary of state, because she has been trying to do that
throughout the campaign, but has only a short time before voters begin casting absentee ballots.
Avoiding overconfidence -- and selling her message
A month ago, when she led Trump by double digits in the polls, Clinton's odds of victory looked good.
Historically the candidate who led in the polls two weeks after the conventions went on to win the election.
But this campaign has defied patterns of history before. Clinton's campaign warned against overconfidence, in
part to keep Democratic voters engaged.
Though Obama's numbers are above 50% -- no small achievement for a late-second-term president, Clinton
always faced a historically difficult feat as a candidate seeking the third successive term for the Democratic
Party.
Moreover, her three decades in politics made her a particularly ill-suited choice for an electorate whose chief
desire is change. She's effectively an incumbent with dynastic baggage facing an outsider candidate in Trump
who built a campaign on voter mistrust of establishment politicians.
But Clinton allies argue that her dual-pronged message has been more succinct this time than it was in 2008.
While many swing-state voters say in interviews they have no idea what her message is, her strategists say it is
piercing through in local markets where she is advertising: the idea that she will put families first while Trump
would put himself first; and that Americans are "stronger together" while Trump would be a divisive force.
Mo Elleithee, a former Democratic strategist who is now executive director of the Georgetown University Institute
of Politics and Public Service, pointed to one ad that Clinton ran just before the Nevada caucuses that he said
was a perfect distillation of that message. It was one featuring a little girl who was afraid that her parents would
get deported. Clinton told the girl to let her worry about it.
"It's incredibly hard for any positive message to break through" in this toxic political climate, Elleithee said. "If
she can make this: 'I've got your back' argument compelling enough, she can chip away" at voter distrust.
That work is important not only to help her win but also to help her govern, he said. "She needs to address that
issue now and continue until after the election.... She could win this race comfortably with no positive message,
but they should not mistake a comfortable win for a mandate."

The Dangerous Man In North Korea By Reuben Abati

Read his piece below...
When our public officials fall asleep while attending a meeting, or an official function, the standard Nigerian
reaction is to have a hearty laugh at their expense. Harmless laughter. You’d remember many photographs
of our lawmakers turning the National Assembly into an extension of their bedrooms, sometimes snoring
loudly in the middle of a heated and loud debate: not that many of them would be of much use anyway
even if they were awake.
Governors, commissioners, high ranking government officials have also all been caught at one time or the other,
sleeping on duty. Well, those whose circadian switches go off like that should count themselves really lucky they
are Nigerians. If they were to try that in North Korea, they will face the firing squad!
Yes, in North Korea, such careless sleeping attracts the death penalty. In that country of 25 million people,
there is a despot in power. He is Kim Jong-un. At 32, he is the world’s youngest leader but probably the most
dangerous man in the world. He rules his country like a concentration camp and continues to commit some of
the world’s most frightening crimes against humanity. Human lives mean nothing to him. He is so desperately
paranoid, the slightest act of irritation in his presence could make him commit murder. His word is law. He is
supreme commander, judge and executioner.
I was literally shivering when I read the latest horror story from Kim Jong-un’s North Korea. Two high-
ranking officials were ordered executed by the dictator. Ri Yong Jin, a senior official at the Ministry of Education,
was accused of putting up an “inappropriate posture” while “The Marshal” was delivering a speech. Ri Yong Jin’s
crime was that he dozed off. Former Agriculture Minister, Hwang Min’s crime was that he dared to disagree
with Kim’s guidelines for designing a working policy on agriculture. He developed his own ideas. He used his
own initiative. He was accused of trying to undermine the leader. Both Jin and Min were marched to the stakes
within 24 hours and executed with anti-aircraft guns. Kim Jong-un is not satisfied with an ordinary gun; his
victims have to face anti-aircraft guns, and you can imagine the impact of such a special purpose gun, targeted
at a human being.
Since assuming office in 2011, Kim Jong-un has murdered more than 70 persons, including elite
government officials who all lived in fear. His own uncle, Jang Song-taek, was one of the earliest victims at the
beginning of his dictatorship. Others include a military officer who was executed for drinking during the official
mourning period for Kim Jong II, Kim Jong-un’s father, and the proximate genetic source of his megalomania.
In 2015, the architect who designed a new airport terminal in Pyongyang was executed because Marshal Kim
did not like his design! And Ri Yong Jin won’t be the first man to die for succumbing to the call of nature. In
April, former Defence Minister Hyong Yong-Choi also faced the firing squad for falling asleep during an event.
The North Korean Human Rights situation is a threat to the whole of mankind. The use of execution, extra-
judicial killing, torture and forced labour as tools of political control is one of the worst abuses of power ever
known.
The United States has imposed sanctions on Kim Jong-un. The United Nations has also officially
condemned his atrocities, but Kim Jong-un is dangerous, again because of the nuclear power and missiles at
his disposal. Starkly egoistic as he is, he could throw the world into utter chaos, were he to press a nuclear
button. The United Nations Security Council has an obligation to take the situation in North Korea more
seriously. Kim Jong-un’s matter should be an urgent matter of concern for the International Criminal Court
(ICC).
I mean, to kill a man for falling asleep? Polysomnographers insist that there is nothing any one can do
about sleep. Even when you don’t suffer from somnipathy, when it is time for the body clock to switch off, it
does so on its own. The best option is to give in to nature so the body can rejuvenate. Many public officials
and business executives run crazy schedules. They over-stretch themselves, either travelling over long distances
and rushing from one meeting to another, without any opportunity to take a few moments of rest - jet-lagged,
tired or exhausted, they could doze off. This is why at many meetings, there is always a coffee pot on standby
or sweets or as I have seen, kolanuts and just about anything that you can put in your mouth to enable you
focus on the event at hand. But even these offer limited help. Balancing work with rest is often a challenge for
busy people. The whole world knows this, except Kim Jong-un who is so insecure he cannot stand other
people’s humanity.
I think of all the government officials in Nigeria who sleep during meetings. If they were to be in North Korea,
they would all be dead by now. I recall incidents involving soldiers on parade, even soldiers of the Guards’
Brigade, suddenly slumping, drawing sympathy, and one particular incident involving a former Minister of State
for Defence, who suddenly slumped while standing at attention at a military event. Try that in North Korea:
immediate execution by a firing squad would be the result. And if I were North Korean myself, and I had served
as official spokesperson to Kim Jong-un, I would have been executed by a firing squad long before 2015.
I used to doze off too at meetings. My boss ran a tough schedule and he had more stamina than his staff.
We could return from a foreign trip by 2 am, and we would all be expected to be at work by 8 am. If you know
how these things work, it could take another two hours to properly disengage and go home, leaving you with
only two hours of sleep. In our case, the principal would have been up and about by 6 am (only God knows
how he always did it) to attend morning devotion and spend some time in the gym, all before 8 am. We the
principal aides would struggle to arrive, still sleepy but struggling to appear capable. Sometimes, the source of
the grogginess may not be jet-lag but just work (and God, we worked!).
From one meeting to the other or a function after another, in the course of the day, I used to doze off
occasionally. Note taking often kept me awake, but there were moments when I simply lost control. You know
that kind of thing: you’d suddenly realize it and jerkily regain consciousness. On such occasions, I often caught
the President glancing at me. But one day, I guess I overdid it. In the middle of a meeting, I must have snored
– that kind of snoring that produces noisy decibels and note-changing, level-revising, rhythmic modulations. It
was the President’s voice that shook me out of the slumber.
“Abati, what is that?”
I opened my eyes.
“Next time you are feeling sleepy, just go out, walk around for a few minutes and come back. But don’t snore
when we are having a meeting.”
In North Korea, that would have earned me an appearance not before an anti-aircraft gun, may be an
armoured tank! Kim Jong-un is crazy. The problem is not form; it is the psychology of power. The civilized world
must stand up for the right of every human being to be human and not have to die because of a leader’s ego.
There is a nightmare going on in North Korea and that is probably better explained by the number of North
Koreans who are fleeing to the neighbouring countries of Japan, China and South Korea.
North Korea - the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK!) - is a hermit state where even the right
to information or free speech is impossible. People are not allowed to communicate with the outside world,
there are restrictions on movement and rights of association, there are no labour rights, the state is so
repressive, there is even a strict national policy on men’s haircut: not more than 2cm hair growth is allowed.
Why? You can’t grow your hair higher than that of the self-styled “great person born of heaven!” What exists in
that country is not leadership, but a cult of personality, and the only personality is the leader whose legitimation
derives not from the people but dynastic inheritance. North Korea is a living demonstration of the dangers of
power acquired not on the grounds of intellectual brilliance or competence or the people’s choice, but heredity.
Regime-change is a popular phrase in closed-door international circles, what is needed in North Korea is not
just regime change, but a people’s revolution that takes power away from class dynasty and hands it over to the
people. The world has enough dangerous men already, tolerating a schizophrenic in the Korean Peninsula who
has access to nuclear power makes the world a bit more dangerous than it is already.